Comments for Ask Cato

Comment on Cato Research Presents at NC East SoCRA Chapter Meeting by event management companies

event management companies — Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:53:56 +0000

This is a massive topic in medical ethics and it’s interesting to see that there are meetings being held to discuss it. It’s so neccessary to judge and evaluate the consent process and a person’s capacity to give consent and hopefully CATO will continue to offer good work in this area.

Comment on HHS Proposes Changes to HIPAA by EvanRichardson

EvanRichardson — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:24:01 +0000

Sure, go ahead! Thanks!

Comment on HHS Proposes Changes to HIPAA by health forum

health forum — Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:19:41 +0000

Do you mind if I quote you post HHS Proposes Changes to HIPAA | Ask Cato on my blog if I link back to this page?

Comment on GlobalSubmit Suite 2010 Beta Test – Part 1 by eCTD News Roundup: Online Articles, Standards News, and Conferences « The eCTD summit

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:57:03 +0000

[...] own GlobalSubmit Suite 2010 Beta Test Program (eCTD publishing, validation, and review) was discussed the “Ask Cato” [...]

Comment on Bookmarks – Collapsed or Expanded? by eCTD News Roundup: Online Articles, Standards News, and Conferences « The eCTD summit

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:56:37 +0000

[...] Richardson of Cato Research posted a useful blog entry, Bookmarks – Collapsed or Expanded? On the “Ask Cato” blog. The entry discusses the FDA reviewers’ preferences for the default [...]

Comment on Accelerated Approval by Tweets that mention Re: - FDA Proposes Withdrawal of Low Blood Pressure Drug -- Topsy.com

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:51:20 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by anniebaver, catoresearch. catoresearch said: Re: http://t.co/IQTHYcf – FDA Proposes Withdrawal of Low Blood Pressure Drug http://t.co/K4rc4of [...]

Comment on Joint Statistical Meetings 2010 Retrospective: A CRO Statistician’s Perspective by Another Joint Statistical Meetings retrospective (A CRO statistician’s perspective) « Random John

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:28:15 +0000

[...] Up over at Ask Cato. [...]

Comment on Bookmarks – Collapsed or Expanded? by M.Shakul Hameed

M.Shakul Hameed — Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:53:24 +0000

I agree with richardson these expanding and collapsing the book marks based on the organizational preference. Some companies they are prefer to expended format some others prefer to collapsed format of bookmarks.

Comment on Bookmarks – Collapsed or Expanded? by EvanRichardson

EvanRichardson — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:42:30 +0000

Thanks for your reply Florence. I agree that it could be annoying for a reviewer to always have to expand the bookmarks. However, I can also imagine that, especially for larger documents, an expanded list of bookmarks could be so long as to make it cumbersome to find a specific bookmark. Since there is no official guidance on this, I think it comes down to personal (or organizational) preference, and there is no wrong way to do it as long as you are consistent.

Comment on Bookmarks – Collapsed or Expanded? by Florence R.

Florence R. — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:59:19 +0000

Hi,
Personnaly I have asked our eCTD publisher to expand the bookmarks (up to the 3rd level) so that the Agencies reviewer don’t have to expand them for each document. Indeed I thought this action would get tiresome in the long run for the reviewer.